esc
Developer Developer

Unix Timestamp 1000000000: The 2001 Unix Billennium

By helpers.work 5 min read
Unix timestamp 1000000000 shown as 9 September 2001 01:46:40 UTC, with local times in Los Angeles, New York, London and Tokyo and a timeline from 1901 to 2106

Unix timestamp 1000000000 marks the moment Unix time reached one billion seconds: Sunday, 9 September 2001, 01:46:40 UTC. Developers nicknamed it the Unix billennium.

It is also the reason for the rule of thumb every developer uses today: "a 10-digit timestamp is seconds, a 13-digit timestamp is milliseconds". Before 2001, current timestamps had only nine digits.

Unix timestamp 1000000000 at a glance

Format Value
Unix seconds 1000000000
Unix milliseconds 1000000000000
ISO 8601 (UTC) 2001-09-09T01:46:40Z
RFC 1123 Sun, 09 Sep 2001 01:46:40 GMT
Day of week (UTC) Sunday
Hex (32-bit) 0x3B9ACA00

Open it in the Unix Timestamp Converter to see every format side by side.

The billennium in different time zones

Because the moment fell early on a Sunday in UTC, it was still Saturday evening across the Americas:

Location Local date and time Offset
Los Angeles 2001-09-08 18:46:40 UTC−07:00
New York 2001-09-08 21:46:40 UTC−04:00
London 2001-09-09 02:46:40 UTC+01:00
Berlin 2001-09-09 03:46:40 UTC+02:00
Kolkata 2001-09-09 07:16:40 UTC+05:30
Tokyo 2001-09-09 10:46:40 UTC+09:00
Sydney 2001-09-09 11:46:40 UTC+10:00

This is a useful example for tests: a single instant with two different calendar dates, depending on the viewer's time zone. If your application groups events "by day", decide explicitly which time zone defines the day.

From 9 digits to 10

The last 9-digit timestamp was 999999999, one second earlier at 01:46:39 UTC. From the billennium onward, every current Unix timestamp in seconds has 10 digits, and it will stay that way for a long time:

Digits (seconds) First value Date (UTC)
9 100000000 1973-03-03 09:46:40
10 1000000000 2001-09-09 01:46:40
11 10000000000 2286-11-20 17:46:40

Millisecond timestamps crossed from 12 to 13 digits at the same instant, since 1000000000000 ms is the same moment. That is why the heuristic works so well today:

function guessUnit(value) {
  const digits = String(Math.trunc(Math.abs(value))).length
  if (digits <= 10) return 'seconds'
  if (digits <= 13) return 'milliseconds'
  return 'microseconds or nanoseconds'
}

Keep in mind that this is a guess, not validation. A timestamp in seconds from 1990 has nine digits, and a small millisecond value such as a duration can have any length. When you control the API, document the unit instead of relying on digit count. The main guide explains how to tell seconds from milliseconds.

Bugs the extra digit exposed

Numbers do not care about digit counts, but text does. The billennium broke code that treated timestamps as strings.

Text sorting

Sorted as strings, a 10-digit value comes before a 9-digit one because "1" is less than "9":

const asText = ['999999999', '1000000000'].sort()
// [ '1000000000', '999999999' ]  wrong order

const asNumbers = [999999999, 1000000000].sort((a, b) => a - b)
// [ 999999999, 1000000000 ]  correct

The same problem appears with timestamps used in file names, cache keys, log lines or database columns declared as text. Anything that orders them alphabetically will misplace values from before and after 2001.

The fix is to store timestamps as numbers, or to zero-pad them to a fixed width that you will never exceed. ISO 8601 strings such as 2001-09-09T01:46:40Z also sort correctly as text, as long as every value uses the same format and time zone.

Fixed-width fields

Formats that reserved exactly nine characters for a timestamp could not hold the new value. Truncating 1000000000 to nine characters produces 100000000, which is a date in 1973, not a crash. Silent data corruption like that is harder to notice than an error.

Validation rules

Regular expressions such as ^\d{9}$ for "a Unix timestamp" stopped matching. Today's equivalent mistake is ^\d{10}$, which rejects valid timestamps before 2001 and every negative timestamp. A more honest check is simply "an integer within the range you support".

Converting 1000000000 in code

JavaScript

new Date(1000000000 * 1000).toISOString() // "2001-09-09T01:46:40.000Z"

Python

from datetime import datetime, timezone

datetime.fromtimestamp(1_000_000_000, tz=timezone.utc).isoformat()
# '2001-09-09T01:46:40+00:00'

Shell

date -u -d @1000000000     # GNU/Linux
date -u -r 1000000000      # macOS / BSD

SQL (PostgreSQL)

SELECT to_timestamp(1000000000) AT TIME ZONE 'UTC';
-- 2001-09-09 01:46:40

Where the billennium sits on the timeline

One billion seconds is about 31.7 years. The next round milestones came much faster in relative terms. Unix timestamp 1234567890 arrived in February 2009, and the series of 1500000000, 1600000000 and 1700000000 followed every three years or so. The next billion, 2000000000, falls in May 2033.

Summary

Unix timestamp 1000000000 is 2001-09-09 01:46:40 UTC, the moment Unix time gained its tenth digit. It is the origin of the 10-digit/13-digit rule of thumb, and a reminder that timestamps should be stored and sorted as numbers, not text.

Check any value in the Unix Timestamp Converter, or read Unix Timestamps Explained for the fundamentals.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

What date is Unix timestamp 1000000000?

Unix timestamp 1000000000 is Sunday, 9 September 2001 at 01:46:40 UTC. In the Americas it was still the evening of Saturday, 8 September 2001.

What is the Unix billennium?

The billennium is the nickname for the moment Unix time reached one billion seconds, on 9 September 2001. It is when Unix timestamps grew from 9 to 10 digits.

How long will Unix timestamps stay 10 digits?

Unix time in seconds stays at 10 digits until 20 November 2286 at 17:46:40 UTC, when it reaches 10000000000. Millisecond timestamps stay at 13 digits for the same period.

Why did the billennium cause bugs?

Some programs stored timestamps as strings or in fixed-width fields. When the value gained a digit, text sorting put 1000000000 before 999999999, and 9-character fields could no longer hold the value.

Try it yourself

Related tools

All tools

More guides in the helpers.work blog

Practical, no-nonsense guides on DNS, email, networking and security — plus 68 free tools to go with them.

Read the blog Browse all tools